In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong.
An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. Dr. King says, Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their governments policy, especially in time of war (3). This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. 804-506-0782 Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. assume youre on board with our, Martin Luther King Jr. vs. President Obama, https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. It also uses a bit of strong imagery. report, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther Kings Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence. He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. This demonstrates to the audience that he realizes it is going to be difficult for them to speak out in opposition of the government. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country.
Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam: a Time to The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. Society's punishments are small wounds compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Many of us have felt the anxiety to speak up against what we know is wrong. requirements? He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. StudyCorgi. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. At The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Would you like to get a custom case study? Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. He expresses that the first step toward equality as the earth moving and nations running with fear. A few lines after, King writes about the injustice the African-American community has faced, by stating, We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. To further show to the audience how his community has been suffering from the war, he uses a comparison statement between the facts to illustrate how freedom has been hard to attain. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A).
Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam - StudyMode In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers.
Vietnam War Rhetorical Analysis - 896 Words | Bartleby Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" By showing his own emotions, King inspires compassion in the. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. He does this when he writes, "It was a step that rocked the richest, most powerful nation to its foundations" (King 96-97). Since an autopsy is only done on dead creatures, King is saying that eventually, the soul of America might die. The imagery paints a dark picture in the audiences mind. us: [emailprotected]. (21). Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your
Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Course Hero But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. King wants his audience. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.".
Rhetorical Analysis Pearl Harbor Speech - 519 Words | Cram For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. 1) Controversial Opinions of MLK 2) Religious figure talking about political problems 3) Malcolm X and his ideas Fitting Response EXIGENCY First Persona-Martin Luther King Second Persona-American Population and the Civil Rights Movement Third Persona- Vietnamese Population He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. Copyright 2023 service.graduateway.com. Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . King uses this metaphor to emphasize the treatment of African Americans in America. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. King successfully brings out the irony behind the war through the use of figurative speech and plenty of imagery to paint a picture of destruction and doom in Vietnam. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message.